...Life and Godliness Part IV...Pastor Phil Strong


2-15-09
-Context-

Text: Genesis 11-12

● I have noticed that both motivation levels and retention levels are always significantly heightened as we understand context and relevance [i.e. remember sitting in classes and wondering to yourself, “When am I ever going to use this?”]

             Context is fundamental. Context provides the environment in which knowledge can ‘come to bear’ (relevant). “Grab the bat” means one thing if you are wearing a baseball uniform and standing in Safeco Field; it means something else entirely if you find yourself at Carlsbad Caverns!

Have you ever heard a company or a franchise or an institution referred to as a ‘storied company’, or ‘storied franchise’? That means that it has a long and celebrated history--- a story that has been preserved through all sorts of symbols and images and through the lives of those who have participated in the story.

            Imagine an individual begin chosen to participate in one of these storied institutions. Imagine as they enter the locker room or the conference room for the first time. That person knows that they are entering into a story that has been going on for a long time; a story initiated as the result of one person’s dream, but now it’s the outcome of the contributions of many through the years who have believed in that story and chosen to live in that story.

● They will now be identified with and by the story which will, no doubt, arouse the best of their energies and commitments.

Eventually, not only will they be recognized for their contributions, but more importantly, they will perpetuate the glory of the franchise itself.

● Something else happens when we enter the story: we find ourselves compelled to re-align and re-arrange our lives in order to make the pursuit of the new life possible (‘embody’).

● The process will be one of “provision” (making room for) and “elimination” (those things you remove to make room).

Saying ‘no’ to certain things does not mean that I am being ‘rigid’ or ‘reactionary’, it simply means that there are certain things which will not contribute the life that I now live. Conversely, I will say ‘yes’ to many things I had not considered before because they will allow me to realize the life that I desire.

● Ours is just such a story, inaugurated and told by God and inclusive of such familiar characters as Adam and Eve, Moses, Abraham and Sarah, David, Jesus, Paul--- even Judas.

            Having become familiar with the author and the story-line itself, ours is now to allow the story to evoke a response that allows us to live out the story in our particular context in a way that is moving the story forward toward the final scene. In the process, our lives somehow become memorable and ultimately reflect the glory of Creator.

►Transformation, rightly understood, must be place in proper context.

            Unfortunately, our approach has often been about ‘sound-bites’ and ‘trailers’, if you will. It’s been about extracting portions of the story, moments removed from context, in order to piece together our own theology (which is exactly what we end up with: ‘our own story’, which often has no continuity and looks little like the real story), rather than allowing the story to unfold before us in often strange and illogical ways and simply seeing it as an invitation to enter.

● If this story is the account of the way things really are, how they have been, and where the story is going, the implications for knowing the story and responding to it are enormous.

● Pivotal to this story is the account of Abraham in Genesis 12, because against the backdrop of human failure and rebellion, we are introduced to ‘grace’.

            Genesis 12 says, despite what happened in chapters 1-11, God is committed to blessing all of humanity.

The rest of the story is the unfolding drama of how God chooses and blesses Abram in response to the ‘curses’ of Genesis 3 and determines to set all of creation right because of his trust in God.

            For the sake of our discussion, let’s identify “blessing” as the “orderly life”--- the favorable outcome of a life centered in God, and “curse”, as the distortion of the good and the dysfunctional life it produces.

Gen.12:3

“All the families of the earth will be blessed through you” [This phrase is repeated (6) times in Genesis alone].

● While the whole earth waits for God’s response, he does the unthinkable: he chooses an impotent elderly couple and he covenants with them to use them to reverse the effects of all that’s gone wrong. Ironically, they live in Babel--- right in the heart of “downtown human depravity”.

Genesis 11: the people have settled into the geographical region identified in antiquity as Babylon. Their name would forever be synonymous with arrogance, confusion and the defiant development of systems and approaches to life independent of God.

● If you look close enough, you will discover that a new world is initiated in this text. In fact, Paul says in Galatians 3:6-9 that this story is “the gospel announced in advance to Abraham”.

This new world is being birthed in barrenness and confusion, just as the original order of creation was established from darkness and chaos.

►Abram will discover that it will be only in the ‘going’ that will allow him to realize blessing.

The blessing that will come can not come from within that world; within those systems. Abram must abandon all connections and ties with those systems and strategies in order to not only be blessed, but become the conduit of blessing to the whole world [unconditional--- God initiated: conditional--- blessing only experienced through obedience].

Babylon, the climax of human rebellion and arrogance portrayed throughout Genesis 1-11 cannot be the source of the solution. The greatest of human wisdom and accomplishments cannot resolve the human dilemma.

● God’s word to Abram and his work through Abram will require an intentional and radical departure from that world. It is the first ‘exodus’ of sorts. Abram must adopt a radically new approach to life which will re-frame reality for him.

● Interestingly, the builders of the tower wanted to ‘make a name for themselves’. Not an uncommon ancient practice, the ‘ziggurat’ was a type of multi-level pyramid usually built for the city god and was a center of civic pride; a monument to human ingenuity and self-determination.

            Although the specific meaning is not spelled out here, the reader can draw the connections: based on the unfolding Genesis story, they were to find their identity and sense of meaning in relationship with God.

Building a tower seems harmless enough, but it was not just about impressive architecture, it was an expression of their determination to resist God’s intentions and develop a society/culture ‘free of the constraints of God’.

● God brings the human project to a halt [shouldn’t he just be happy that we’re all ‘making nice’ after the whole flood ordeal?], not because he is worried that they will succeed and eventually ‘rival’ him, but because he knows that in their pursuit, it will strengthen their resolve, driving them further from him and each other and eventually result in self-destruction.

God knows the nature of sin in the individual, but also the damaging effects of sin in collaboration. Such distorted unity always puts God’s good creation at risk. So, ironically, to Abram God says, “I will make your name great”.

►So, ours is a story ‘steeped in grace’.

- The selection of Israel is always set in the context of God’s universal love.

YHWH, the one true God who had personally revealed himself to them, is the unique Creator-God of the universe, so that, what he had in mind for Israel in particular, was a reflection of what he desired to accomplish universally. Israel was to see herself as cooperative agents of God’s restorative love.

- By choosing Israel, God was not rejecting other nations and peoples.

Exodus 19:4-6

“You have seen what I did to the Egyptians. You know how I brought you to myself and carried you on eagle’s wings. Now, if you will obey me and keep my covenant, you will be my own special treasure from among all the nations of the earth; for all the earth belongs to me. And you will be to me a kingdom of priests, my holy nation. Give this message to the Israelites”.

● God was calling a people to himself who would humbly recognize the futility of human arrogance and willing abandon those strategies for trust in God and his story.    

-  Chosenness is about God’s incomprehensible love for his good creation.

            Isn’t this the essence of love… being chosen? We can not experience love in isolation; it has to originate from outside of us.

            Jesus asked the question, “Do you love me? Then keep my commands.” (John 14:15) Only love is powerful enough to capture the heart and produce the transformation that we desire.

It has to manifest itself as a ‘setting aside’ or ‘setting apart’, but it’s the idea that we are loved despite ourselves that makes the setting apart special.

- Israel’s chosenness was indicative of God’s commitment to the goodness of creation.

God’s salvation is being worked out in the context of human cultures and societies. It is not ‘other-worldly’ in the sense that it is ignores the human dilemma or chooses to abandon it for some other type of reality; but, it is ‘other-worldly’ in the sense that is originates in ‘God’s dimension’--- his kingdom, his dreams, where what he desires is the rule of the day.

‘What now?’ Transformation is about producing…

            - A people called for his own name and glory [that calling would include the removal of any obstacles that would prevent restored relationship].

- A people who would not only find life in him, but learn life from him [which would require re-aligment/re-orientation].

- A people who would willingly and routinely embody the values of the Kingdom right here and right now, for the good of the world [incarnational presence].

-          A people who will find that kind of life as they experience and interact with the personal and empowering presence of Jesus in the person of the Holy Spirit [enablement].

 ● I guess what I am trying to convey is that transformation should not be (and rightly understood, cannot be) pursued as simply a means of quieting the inner-tension that we feel because ‘life has not worked out as we had planned’.

It must be pursued within this context of returning to the kind of person that I was created to be and the kind of life that I was meant to live, with God and with others.

● When Jesus said, “Unless you deny yourself…”, or “You can’t serve two masters”, he was not saying, “Unless you’ve got a death wish, you can’t follow me”, he was saying that the life being made available to you can be realized in no other way. He’s simply saying, “You can’t have it both ways; you can’t follow my agenda for life and yours”. He’s not being harsh or exclusionary, but honest. There’s no such thing as ‘partial allegiance’ or ‘selective devotion’.

►The story that currently orders your life derives its power from your willingness to believe it (trust; place confidence in) and your determination to pursue it as reality.