|
||
|
Jesus: The Wisdom of God
9-19-10
“small gate/wide gate”; “narrow road/broad road”
(Matt.7)… “sand/solid rock
foundations” (Matt.7)…
“light/darkness”… “earthly wisdom/wisdom from heaven” (James 3)…
“trust in the Lord/wise in your own
eyes” (Prov.3:5-7)… “path of the
wicked/path of the righteous” (Prov.4:14-19)...
“wisdom of the world/wisdom of God”
(1 Cor.1)…
…all representative of the
(2)-ways motif so often
expressed in the Bible and characterizing the (2) contrasting approaches to
life:
“wisdom” and “folly”
(foolishness).
Wisdom- the approach that
honors God (recognizes him) as central and seeks to re-order their lives in
order to accommodate such a way of life.
“Fear of the Lord…”
(Proverbs 9:10): The stock-biblical-phrase for a way of life that pays
attention to God and lives responsively.
“Fear of the Lord” is about
intentionally interrupting our pre-occupation with ourselves in order to
attend to God. Folly- life from our own limited vantage point; seeing ourselves as our own point of reference. Essentially a life being formed from the premise that “… there is no God” (Psalm 14:1).
Wisdom is not theoretical or abstract; it is not simply the accumulation and
acceptance of facts or information. Wisdom only exists when people think and
act according to truth.
The language that Jesus used seemed to contrast the radical inclusion
(welcome) associate with the Kingdom of Heaven with the limitations of
acceptance.
What becomes even more apparent is that Jesus is perpetually
challenging our definition of life and the self-defeating means we often use
to pursue it. In a word, “destruction” (lit. ‘loss’, ‘ruin’, ‘misery’, ‘to
render useless’).
“I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to Father except through
me”
(John 14:6)
Add that to the list of things that Jesus said that makes me nervous.
I have found that, as a Christian, it is often easier for me to talk about
what I believe or talk about what I should do than to “live”.
Honestly, it seemed much easier when faith was just about the
accumulation of creeds and doctrines or just about a ‘not so tidy’ list of
commands or morality to perform (“Just tell me what I need to do and I’ll do
it”, as if it were just about having Godly manners.
“Life” is where it gets challenging, especially at the intersection of my
kingdom and the expansive Kingdom of God which is already here, and yet so
easily ignored.
But, we have phrases like
God “with” us,
Christ “in me” (Galatians
2:20),
God “for us” (Romans 8:31) to
remind us that Christianity is about a connection with God that doesn’t
leave us fending for ourselves. We are not the point… God is, but we are
being invited to participate in all that he is doing.
●
We are also reminded that we cannot
participate with what God is doing and insist on doing it our own way.
If we do it “our way”, it won’t be truth and life and it won’t be his
Kingdom.
Diversification is a wonderful financial concept, but a poor approach to
life [eggs in one basket!]
Diversification is a great idea if you are considering your financial
portfolio, because it allows for some investments to not perform well.
Devotion means,
‘considering no other options’.
When there are options available, we become distracted and lose singleness
of heart (Jer.32). But, we hesitate to give ourselves fully to anything or
anyone. We need to keep our options open.
If we are not convinced that Jesus is the way, we will not be able to pursue
him with the “all or nothing” passion that a relationship (love) seems to
require.
When we say “yes”, to following Jesus, we are also saying “no”, to
everything upon which we might depend for life.
“Whoever loses his life, for my sake, will find it”
(Matthew 10:39).
It’s almost as if Jesus knew that the challenge had to be ‘sharp’ and
clear. Jesus knew that the message had to be decisive and offer clarity in a
spiritual climate where the distinctions were often blurred.
He knew that following him would feel risky, but he also knew that simply
adding him to an already overwhelmed way of life would be deceitful and
detrimental.
● I think people are desperate for…
A WAY
(path to follow; a means of pursuing and realizing the life we desire)-
“It is what it is”… the modern
declaration of futility. It’s that space between our expectations and our
reality.
If there is no way, life is confusing
and ambiguous.
TRUTH-
a viable representation of the ways things really are. Something to help us
make sense of our lives and our world; a way to explain our world.
If there is no truth, life is
pointless and uncertain; there’s no story… no conclusion… only a mass of
contradictions.
LIFE-
the need to experience an approach which allows me to “connect” with the
“other” and with “you” in a way that makes me more fully human.
If there is no life, there’s only
existence; no intrinsic value to us (which has far-reaching moral
and ethical implications). Nihilism ( the conviction that existence is
senseless and useless) is our most attractive option.
The faith that we espouse, “Christianity”, comes to us as ‘story’; an
over-arching story which is inclusive of many stories.
Although that term is rife with baggage, it identifies us, first and
foremost, as a people who are
finding life in
and
learning life from Jesus.
Interestingly, we were originally referred to as
“people of the Way” (Acts
9:2; 19:8, 23; 22:4; 24:14, 23).
The challenge? Not adopting a different way of identifying ourselves (since
the label “Christian” has such glaring negative connotations), but
portraying a life that makes such a description more attractive; appealing:
attaching a better connotation to it.
Our pursuits must be directed at distinguishing between the authentic
message of Jesus and our version of it
(Christianity 2.0). I think we would all agree that the call to follow Jesus
was demanding enough that it doesn’t need to be ‘muddled’ by our commentary
(“You’ve heard Jesus say, but I
say to you…”).
● I suggested last week that in making this statement, Jesus was attempting
to
“lead us somewhere”, to
“connect us to something”.
That
“somewhere” was
the Kingdom and that
“something” was
the story.
The story included meals, feasts, sacrifices, festivals, rites and symbols,
all meant to solidify the story and strengthen the sense of community. It
said,
“This is who we are”, and
they refused to allow that to be reduced to just a few propositional truths
upon which they would be expected to agree.
It was a “way”; a “life to be
lived”.
● Let me make these observations about stories:
First, due to our
fascination with breaking everything down to its smallest part, we are no
longer able to discern or convey a “cohesive story”.
Second, once a story
loses its cohesiveness (detached from other stories), it becomes purely
subjective. We’re no longer all telling the same story.
Third, once you dismiss
the author, you lose the story itself.
Having lost the story itself, you are left to determine reality for
yourself, which, may seem appealing, but is actually the worst possible
scenario you could imagine.
That’s really what’s at the center
of our continued brokenness. We have exchanged this broad, expansive story
for our own myopic explanations. |